Investigating the effect of external reference prices’ representation on consumers’ price evaluation and decision making with eye tracking method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2023.57.KSZ.01.07Keywords:
Behavioral Economics, Reference Price, Framing, Loss Aversion, Eye TrackingAbstract
The aims of the paper
According to the principle of behavioral economics, consumers frequently apply heuristics when deciding which can lead to biased perceptions and decisions. In our investigation we concentrated on some peculiar types of these heuristics, namely loss aversion, framing and reference point. In our research, our aim was to examine how the application of these phenomena in the display of external reference prices affects consumers’ price evaluation and decision-making.
Methodology
In our research we implemented a relatively new, eye tracking method and complemented it with interviews and a short attitudinal survey at the end of the experiment. We considered this important because this way, besides the eye tracking results - which provided the opportunity for quantitative as well as qualitative data analysis - we got to know additional consumer insights during interviews, while the attitude scale gave us the opportunity to group the participants of the experiment according to their price-conscious behavior.
Most important results
We found that those who fixated on the prices longer could recall them more precisely. Furthermore, we found, that people concentrate more on the original prices when evaluating a sale offer, therefore, it is advisable to highlight the original price, which is a reference point, instead of the sale price. Surprisingly we found a negative connection between price consciousness and the fixation duration spent on the prices.
Recommendations
In our research we found, that within a price offer it is necessary to indicate and highlight the original price to provide a reference point. On the other hand, within a complex offer, it is better to publish the price at the end of the offer, unless the advertiser's goal is to emphasize the price. Furthermore, we found that people with different price awareness perceive offers differently, so it may be worth considering this during consumer segmentation and targeting.
References
Angner, E. and Loewenstein, G. (2012). „Behavioral Economics”, Mäki, U. (szerk.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Amszterdam: Elsevier, 13, 641-689.
Ariely, D. (2008): Predictably Irrational, New York: HarperCollins
Bolton, R. and Shankar, V. (2003), “An Empirically Driven Taxonomy of Retailer Pricing and Promotion Strategies” Journal of Retailing, 79(4), 213–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2003.09.005
Cheng, L. L. and Monroe, K. B. (2013), „An appraisal of behavioral price research (part 1): price as a physical stimulus”, AMS Review, 3(3), 103–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-013-0041-1
Coulter, K. S. and Coulter, R. A. (2005), “Size Does Matter: The Effects of Magnitude Representation Congruency on Price Perceptions and Purchase Likelihood”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 64–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_9
Estelami, H. (2003), „Strategic Implications of a Multi-Dimensional Pricing Environment” Journal of Product and Brand Management, 12(5), 322–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420310491684
Feng, G. (2011), „Eye Tracking: A Brief Guide for Developmental Researchers”, Journal of Cognition & Development, 12(1), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.547447
Kahneman, D. (2011), Thinking, Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux Inc.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. N. (1984), “Choices, Values and Frames”, American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
Kenesei Zs. (2005), “Az árinformációk keresése, feldolgozása és felhasználása a vásárlások során - a szakértelem és az érdekeltség szerepe”, Vezetéstudomány, 36(3), 39–47. o.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2005.03.05
Kim, H. M. and Kachersky, L. (2006), „Dimensions of Price Salience: A Conceptual Framework for Perceptions of Multi-Dimensional Prices”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 15(2), 139–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420610658974
Korpás Z., Szabó B. (2019), „Az online reklámok közvetlen hatásának vizsgálata a vásárlási döntésekre”, Marketing & Menedzsment, 53(2), 31–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2019.53.02.03
Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., Brady, M., Goodman, M. and Hansen, T. (2012), Marketing Management, England: Pearson Education Limited
Manning, K. C. and Sprott, D. E. (2009), “Price Endings, Left-Digit Effects, and Choice”, Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 328–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/597215
Niedrich, R. W., Sharma, S. and Wedell, D. H. (2001), “Reference Price Perceptions: A Comparison of Alternative Models”, Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 339–354.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/323726
Rekettye G. and Liu, J. (2018), Pricing: The New Frontier, London: Transnational Press
Santana, S., Thomas, M. and Morwitz, V. G. (2020), “The Role of Numbers in the Customer Journey”, Journal of Retailing, 96(1), 138–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2019.09.005
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven: Yale University Press
Tversky, A. M. and Kahneman, D. (1974), “Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511809477.002
Weiser, I. (2016), Az árazás 48 törvénye – Árazz jól, keress jobban!, Szeged: Ez Design. Grafikai Kft.
