Why do we eat what we eat? Eating motivations of Hungarian consumers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2022.56.KSZ.01.03Keywords:
eating motivation, TEMS, Transtheoretical Model of Change, segmentationAbstract
THE AIMS OF THE PAPER
Programs to improve eating habits have not been very effective so far. To move the population towards a healthier diet, it is worth knowing what motivates consumers in their food choices. The aim of our study is therefore to explore the eating motivations of Hungarian consumers, the relative importance of each motivation, possible differences in motivations along the stages of the transition to a healthy diet and background variables, and to segment the population based on their eating motivations.
METHODOLOGY
In order to achieve our goal, we conducted a nationwide representative questionnaire survey, in which we measured eating motivations with The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS) and the transition to healthy eating with the Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM). The relative importance of eating motivations was described by simple descriptive statistics, and then factor and cluster analyses were performed based on eating motivations.
MOST IMPORTANT RESULTS
According to our results, the liking and enjoyment of food, hunger, as well as habit, tradition and comfort are extremely important motivations for Hungarian consumers, while the health, naturalness and role of food in weight control are less likely to motivate them. The latter motivators are more common among women, those with higher education, and those with lower BMI. It was also found that need, convenience, tradition, and price have a significant motivating power at the beginning of the transition to a healthier diet, but their role typically decreases in the process. The eating motivations of Hungarian consumers are grouped into eight factors, based on which we were able to identify four segments of consumers.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Our results may contribute to the development of programs aiming to improve eating habits based on consumers’ food choices. The typical motivators of subsequent stages of TTM have highlighted the fact that the transition to a healthier diet should be facilitated by programs that emphasize that a healthy diet can be achieved without starvation and discomfort. Of the four clusters identified, the part of the “conscious eaters” segment that is in the contemplation, preparation, or action stages of TTM can be the target group of a behavior change program. While the first group could be moved towards a healthier diet by informative messages, the second one by persuasive messages, and the third one by reinforcing messages.
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by grant EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00003. The project was supported by the European Union, co-financed by the European Social Fund.
References
Bouwman, L., Hiddink, G. J., Koelen, M. A., Korthals, M., van Veer, P., van Woerkum, C. (2005), “Personalized nutrition communication through ICT application: how to overcome the gap between potential effectiveness and reality”, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59(Suppl. 1), S108-S116 DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602182
Dernóczy-Pólyák, A., Keller, V. (2017), „Klaszterképzés evési magatartás alapján – fókuszban a generációk”, Vezetéstudomány, 48(5), 28-38 DOI: 10.14267/VEZTUD.2017.03.03
Fallaize, R., Macready, A. L., Butler, L. T., Ellis, J. A., Lovegrove, J. A. (2013), “An insight into the public acceptance of nutrigenomic-based personalised nutrition”, Nutrition Research Reviews, 26(1), 39-48 DOI: 10.1017/S0954422413000024
Gill, J. & Johnson, P. (2010), Research Methods for Managers, 4th edition, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Horwath, C. C. (1999), “Applying the transtheoretical model to eating behaviour change: challenges and opportunities”, Nutrition Research Reviews, 12(2), 281-317 DOI: 10.1079/095442299108728965
Jackson, B., Cooper, M. L., Mintz, L., Albino, A. (2003), “Motivations to eat. Scale development and validation”, Journal of Research in Personality, 37(4), 297-318 DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00574-3
Pollard, J., Kirk, S. F. L., Cade, J. E. (2002), Factors affecting food choice in relation to fruit and vegetable intake. A review”, Nutrition Research Reviews, 15(2), 373-387 DOI: 10.1079/NRR200244
Prochaska, J. O. & DiClemente, C. C. (1984), The transtheoretical approach: Crossing the traditional boundaries of change, Homewood: J. Irwin
Prochaska, J. O., Norcross, J. C., DiClemente, C. C. (1994), Changing for good: the revolutionary program that explains the six stages of change and teaches you how to free yourself from bad habits, New York: W. Morrow
Renner, B., Sproesser, G., Strohbach, S., Schupp, H. T. (2012), “Why we eat what we eat. The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS)”, Appetite, 59(1), 117-128 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.04.004
Roininen, K., Lähteenmäki, L., Tuorila, H. (1999), “Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods”, Appetite, 33(1), 71-88 DOI: 10.1006/appe.1999.0232
Sajtos, L. - Mitev, A. (2007), SPSS kutatási és adatelemzési kézikönyv, Budapest: Alinea Kiadó
Sproesser, G. (2016), Why we eat what we eat: Psychological influences on eating behavior, Dissertation, Konstanz, Germany: Universität Konstanz, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Sektion, Fachbereich Psychologie
Steptoe, A., Pollard, T. M., Wardle, J. (1995), “Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food. The food choice questionnaire”, Appetite, 25(3), 267-284 DOI: 10.1006/appe.1995.0061
Szabó, K., Pikó, B. (2017), „Az étkezési magatartás összefüggése az ételválasztási motivációkkal és egyes személyiségbeli jellemzőkkel középiskolások körében”, Egészségfejlesztés, 58(2), 5-16 DOI: 10.24365/ef.v58i2.152
Szakály, Z. (2009), „Egészségmagatartás és funkcionális élelmiszerek: hogyan vélekednek a hazai fogyasztók?”, Élelmiszer, Táplálkozás és Marketing, 6(1-2), 9-18
van Strien, T., Frijters, J. E. R., Bergers, G. P. A., Defares, P. B. (1986), “The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for Assessment of Restrained, Emotional, and External Eating Behavior”, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5(2), 295-315 DOI: 10.1002/1098-108X(198602)5:2<295::AID-EAT2260050209>3.0.CO;2-T
KSH (2019a): Táblák (STADAT) – Idősoros éves adatok – Népesség, népmozgalom / 1.2. Népesség a település jellege szerint, január 1. (1980–2018); 1.3. Népesség korév és nem szerint (1980–2018) http://www.ksh.hu/stadat_eves_1. (Utolsó letöltés: 2019.09.01.)
KSH (2019b): Táblák (STADAT) – Idősoros éves, területi adatok – Népesség, népmozgalom / 6.1.1. A lakónépesség nem szerint, január 1. (2001–2018) http://www.ksh.hu/stadat_eves_6_1. (Utolsó letöltés: 2019.09.01.)
WHO (2018): Noncommunicable diseases. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases (Utolsó letöltés: 2018.06.01.)