The role of self-congruity in the visual processing of hedonic and utilitarian attributes with eye-tracking

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2026.60.KSZ.01.02

Keywords:

self-conguity, hedonic product attributes, utilitarian product attributes, eye-tracking, online shopping

Abstract

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The primary aim of this exploratory study is to investigate how consumers’ visual attention is allocated between emotional (hedonic) and functional (utilitarian) product attributes in an online shopping environment.  Furthermore, the research examines the extent to which attention directed at hedonic and utilitarian features contributes to self-congruity, with particular emphasis on the distinction between the actual and the ideal self-image.

METHODOLOGY
The exploratory study was conducted on two popular drugstore websites with the participation of 15 university students. The participants completed two shopping tasks of different complexity, resulting in a total of 30 observations (15 participants × 2 tasks). Most of the data collection sessions exceeded one hour. The research employed a mixed-methods approach. Firstly, quantitative eye-tracking data (average fixation duration, number of intervals) were analyzed. In total, 265 intervals were identified and evaluated. Secondly, qualitative methods (RTA interviews, and in-depth interviews to explore self-congruity) complemented the findings. The study also served as a UX and website usability test, providing deeper insights into decision-making processes and user experience. Due to the exploratory nature of the research, the analysis focuses on identifying visual attention patterns and generating hypotheses rather than seeking broad statistical generalization.

KEY FINDINGS
Findings indicate that within the studied sample, participants paid more visual attention to hedonic attributes than to utilitarian ones across both platforms. Moreover, when evaluating products aligned with their ideal self image, participants exhibited a focal increase in attention to hedonic features. Among the utilitarian attributes, product information attracted the greatest attention, whereas among the hedonic features, colour emerged as the most influential, particularly for participants who selected brands that resonated with their ideal self-image.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
The study indicates that, in addition to design, the content structure of online retail platforms can also have a substantial impact on consumer attention. Retailers are advised to place greater emphasis on hedonic attributes (such as colour, packaging, and aesthetic product descriptions), as these are more likely to capture consumer focus and strengthen emotional attachment to the brand. It is vital that functional attributes are presented concisely and systematically, given that consumers tend to process such information more rapidly and often supplement it with evaluations from external sources.

References

Aaker, J. L. (1999), „The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion”, Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151914

Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R. & Griffin, M. (1994), „Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value”, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1086/209376

Batra, R. & Ahtola, O. T. (1991), „Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes”, Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436035

Bettiga, D., Bianchi, A. M., Lamberti, L. & Noci, G. (2020), „Consumers’ emotional responses to functional and hedonic products: A neuroscience research”, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 559779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559779

Dastan, I. & Gecti, F. (2014), „Relationships among utilitarian and hedonic values, brand affect and brand trust in the smartphone industry”, Journal of Management Research, 6(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v6i2.5261

Fiore, A. M., Jin, H. J. & Kim, J. (2005), „For fun and profit: Hedonic value from image interactivity and responses toward an online store”, Psychology & Marketing, 22(8), 669–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20079

Gönczi, K. & Hlédik, E. (2020), „Online vásárlási folyamat hatékonyságának növelése – két webáruház használhatóságának összehasonlítása szemmozgáskövetéssel”, Vezetéstudomány, 51(3), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2020.03.06

Hirschman, E. C. & Holbrook, M. B. (1982), „Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions”, Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251707

Hámornik, B. P., Hlédik, E., Józsa, E. & Lógó, E. (2013), „Termékattribútumok vizuális keresése tejtermékek csomagolásán: Az érdeklődési övezetek (AOI) kijelölésének két módszerének összehasonlítása”, Marketing & Menedzsment, 47(3), 36–47.

Huber, F., Eisele, A. & Meyer, F. (2018), „The role of actual, ideal, and ought self-congruence in the consumption of hedonic versus utilitarian brands”, Psychology & Marketing, 35(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21070

Ibrahim, H. & Najjar, F. (2008), „Assessing the effects of self‐congruity, attitudes and customer satisfaction on customer behavioural intentions in retail environment”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500810860638

Islam, M. & Kang, M. & Haile, T. (2021), „Do Hedonic or Utilitarian Types of Online Product Reviews Make Reviews More Helpful? A New Approach to Understanding Customer Review Helpfulness on Amazon”, Journal of Global Information Management, 29, 1–18.

Jamal, A. & Goode, M. M. H. (2001), „Consumers and brands: A study of the impact of self‐image congruence on brand preference and satisfaction”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19(7), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500110408286

Kim, J., Fiore, A. M. & Lee, H. H. (2007), „Influence of online store perception, shopping enjoyment, and shopping involvement on consumer patronage behavior towards an online retailer”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14(2), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2006.05.001

Li, J., Abbasi, A., Cheema, A. & Abraham, L. B. (2020), „Path to Purpose? How Online Customer Journeys Differ for Hedonic Versus Utilitarian Purchases”, Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920911628

Lipták, L. & Prónay, Sz. (2023), „A külső referenciaárak megjelenítésének fogyasztói árértékelésre és döntésre gyakorolt hatásának szemkamerás vizsgálata”, Marketing & Menedzsment, 57(KSZ), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2023.57.KSZ.01.07

Litvin, S. W. & Kar, G. H. (2004), „Individualism/collectivism as a moderating factor to the self-image congruity concept”, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 10(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/135676670301000103

Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D. & Nyffenegger, B. (2011), „Emotional Brand Attachment and Brand Personality: The Relative Importance of the Actual and the Ideal Self”, Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.35

Malhotra, N. K. (1988), „Self concept and product choice: An integrated perspective”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(88)90029-3

Martínez-López, F. J., Pla-García, C., Gázquez-Abad, J. C. & Rodriguez-Ardura, I. (2016), „Hedonic motivations in online consumption behaviour”, International Journal of Business Environment, 8(2), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBE.2016.076628

Nejati, M. & Moghaddam, P. P. (2013), „The effect of hedonic and utilitarian values on satisfaction and behavioural intentions for dining in fast-casual restaurants in Iran”, British Food Journal, 115(11), 1583–1596. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2011-0257

Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N. & Simonson, I. (2007), „Preference fluency in choice”, Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.347

Overby, J. W. & Lee, E. J. (2006), „The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions”, Journal of Business Research, 59(10-11), 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.008

Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J. & MacInnis, D. J. (1986), „Strategic brand concept-image management”, Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251291

Prónay Sz. (2011), „Fogyasztás és identitás összefüggései a fiatalok körében”, in: Fojtik, J. (szerk.), Felelős marketing – A Magyar Marketing Szövetség Marketing Oktatók Klubja 17. országos konferenciájának előadásai, Pécs: Pécsi Tudományegyetem Közgazdaságtudományi Kar, 85–94.

Roggeveen, A. L., Grewal, D., Karsberg, J., Noble, S. M., Nordfält, J., Patrick, V. M., Schweiger, E., Soysal, G., Dillard, A., Cooper, N. & Olson, R. (2021), „Forging meaningful consumer-brand relationships through creative merchandise offerings and innovative merchandising strategies”, Journal of Retailing, 97(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.11.006

Downloads

Published

2026-06-16

How to Cite

Szász, T. and Hlédik, E. (2026) “The role of self-congruity in the visual processing of hedonic and utilitarian attributes with eye-tracking”, The Hungarian Journal of Marketing and Management, 60(Különszám 1. EMOK), pp. 15–26. doi: 10.15170/MM.2026.60.KSZ.01.02.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.