Some dimensions of the social perception of domestic civil organizations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2023.57.04.02

Keywords:

non-governmental organization, organizational reputation, awareness, success

Abstract

THE AIMS OF THE PAPER

By the end of the twentieth century, authors on the subject (among others) had also identified products and services and corporate social responsibility as important factors in corporate reputation. But the question arises: how do the factors influencing reputation evolve for organizations where social responsibility is the service itself? This question is of particular interest in the case of domestic NGOs, whose development after the change of regime has been significantly influenced by the state and Western NGOs, creating a special situation in the sector. Nowadays, visibility and reputation are often a guarantee for the survival of an NGO. Therefore, this study aims to explore the development of visibility, an important dimension of the reputation of domestic NGOs, in the case of individual NGOs. On the other hand, to examine the extent to which the perceptions of organizations and stakeholders on the determinants of reputation are consistent.

METHODOLOGY

In this research study, we use the results of eight organizational interviews and a random, non-representative survey of one hundred people to answer these questions. The organizational interviews helped to prepare and refine the questionnaire. The questionnaire survey investigated the visibility and reputation of fourteen domestic NGOs along several dimensions that deal with less popular social issues.

MOST IMPORTANT RESULTS

The first part of the research described in this study investigates two hypotheses: (H1) the most important factors for the reputation of social organizations are credibility, quality service, and employer brand. Although this hypothesis was only partially confirmed, the findings can provide a number of lessons for NGOs. In terms of visibility, our hypothesis is that (H2) more people think they know the NGOs surveyed than actually know them. The research found no significant difference between perceived and actual awareness.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Among the reputation factors, organizations attach less importance to transparency, motivation of contributors, visibility, and communication than stakeholders. This could be an important lesson for NGOs to learn for their development, as stakeholders are their potential volunteers and supporters, so it may be worth considering their views.

Author Biographies

Tea Erdélyi, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kék Pont Foundation

PhD Student, CEO

Katalin Szabó, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences

Associate Professor

References

Baldauf, C., Herman, S., Moritz, W. (2002) „Marketing és menedzsment a civil szférában egy hotelprojekt példáján”, Marketing & Menedzsment, 36(5-6), 132–137. https://journals.lib.pte.hu/index.php/mm/article/view/1422 (Elérés: 6 december 2022).

Bromley, D. B. (2000), “Psychological aspects of corporate identity, image and reputation”, Corporate Reputation Review, 3(3), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540117

Dalton, J. M. & Croft, S. (2003) “Managing Corporate Reputation: A Specially Commissioned Report”, Thorogood, ISBN: 9781854182722

Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, R. & Roper, S. (2004) ”A Corporate Character Scale to Assess Employee and Customer Views of Organization Reputation”, Corporation Reputation Review 7, 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540216

Edelman: Trust Barometer (2001-2024), https://www.edelman.com/ (letöltés: 2024.03.18.)

Etter, M., Ravasi, D., & Colleoni, E. (2019), “Social Media and the Formation of Organizational Reputation”, Academy of Management Review, 44(1), 28-52. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0280

Fombrun, C. (1996), Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.

Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A. & Sever, J. M. (2000), “The Reputation Quotient. A Multi-stakeholder Measure of Corporate Reputation”, Journal of Grand Management, 7(4), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2000.10

Fombrun, C. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004), Fame & Fortune – How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputation, Pearson Education Inc. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540007

Fortune Magazin: Word’s Most Admired Companies (1982-2022) https://fortune.com/ranking/worlds-most-admired-companies/ (utolsó letöltés: 2023.07.10.)

GlobalRepTrack (2006-2023) https://www.reptrak.com/rankings/ (utolsó letöltés: 2024.03.18.)

Mitchell, G.E., & Stroup, S.S. (2017), “The reputations of NGOs: Peer evaluations of effectiveness”, The Review of International Organizations, 12, 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-016-9259-7

Nagy Á., Nizák P., Vercseg I. (2014), Civil társadalom-nonprofit világ, Új Ifjúsági Szemle Alapítvány, ISBN: 978-963-08-6971-3. https://mek.oszk.hu/18600/18693/18693.pdf (Letöltés ideje: 2021.08.05)

Roper, S. & Fill, C. (2012), Corporate Reputation. ISBN 9780273727613, Pearson Education Inc.

Schreiber, E.S. (2002), "Why do many otherwise smart CEOs mismanage the reputation asset of their company?", Journal of Communication Management, 6(3), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540210807053

Schweizer, T. S. & Wijnberg, N. M. (1999), “Transferring reputation to the corporation in different cultures: individuals, collectives, systems and the strategic management of corporate reputation”, Corporate Reputation Review, 2(3), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540083

Sjöberg, G. E. (2004), „A „globális falu” már itt van. Előadás a 2002. évi Atlas díj átvételekor”, Fordította és közreadta: Szeles P., CEO Magazin, 2004/2.

Szeles P. (1998), A hírnév ereje (image és arculat). Bp., Star PR Ügynökség Worldcom, 139-308. ISBN 9630485605

Szondy R. (2015), „A kommunikációtudomány társadalmi megítélésének formálása”, JELKÉP, 2015/KLSZ https://doi.org/10.20520/Jel-Kep.2015.1.KLSZ.35

Tocqueville, de A. (1835), Democracy in Amerika. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Democracy_in_America (Letöltés ideje: 2022.12.20.)

van Ham, P., Martini, B. (2002), „A márkás állam felemelkedése - Az imázs és hírnév posztmodern politikája”, Marketing & Menedzsment, 36(1), 3–7. https://journals.lib.pte.hu/index.php/mm/article/view/1597

Downloads

Published

2024-05-27

How to Cite

Erdélyi, T. and Szabó, K. (2024) “Some dimensions of the social perception of domestic civil organizations”, The Hungarian Journal of Marketing and Management, 57(4), pp. 15–24. doi: 10.15170/MM.2023.57.04.02.

Issue

Section

Papers