Women’s career opportunities in the 21st century - a systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2025.59.KSZ.01.03Keywords:
female leaders, work and private life, career opportunities, PRISMAAbstract
THE AIM OF THE PAPER
Women’s roles and opportunities have changed significantly in the 21st century. Social norms, labor market trends, and technological innovations all influence women’s professional development. The aim of the study is a systematic literature review that highlights the fact that the number of publications investigating women’s roles has been steadily increasing in recent decades, and more and more professional materials deal with, for example, work-ife balance and the labor market effects of having children. The research field is relatively new, and the explosion of publications in the past ten years can be attributed to the current wave of feminist movements, as well as the rise of the digital revolution and social media.
METHODOLOGY
The application of the PRISMA method during the systematic literature search reflects various aspects, such as the number of relevant publications, their distribution by research areas and countries. Further application of the PRISMA method and refinement of search criteria, even by narrowing the keywords, is expected to help the research tobe more accurate and broader in scope, enabling the scientific community to better understand and evaluate studies and publications concerning women’s roles.
MOST IMPORTANT RESULTS
This type of research not only helps to process and understand the literature background, but also plays an important role in raising social awareness, mapping solution proposals, which supports the breakthrough of the so-called glass ceiling and provides assistance in women’s career development. Its main points include education, employment inequality, family roles and patterns.
RECOMMENDATIONS
After applying the methodology, the direction is clear: the most important factor is the correct use of the employer’s toolkit, monitoring the digital transformation and ensuring the possibility of working from home. The aim is that future trends and results can contribute to the promotion of gender equality.
References
Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012), “Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter?” Management Science, 58(2), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1287/ mnsc.1110.1452
Bertrand, M., Black, S. E., Jensen, S., & Lleras Muney, A. (2018), “Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labour market outcomes in Norway”, The Review of Economic Studies, 86(1), 191-239. https://doi. org/10.1093/restud/rdy032
Cannito, M., & Scavarda, A. (2020), “Childcare and remote work during the COVID-19 pand emic. Ideal worker model, parenthood and gen der inequalities in Italy”, Italian Sociological Review, 10(3S), 801–801. org/10.13136/isr.v10i3S.399 https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v10i3S.399
Ceja, L., Agulles, R., & Tàpies, J. (2010), The importance of values in family-owned firms, Working Paper WP-875 July, IESE Business School-University of Navarra, https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.1701642
Christofides, L. N., Polycarpou, A., & Vrachimis, K. (2013), “Gender wage gaps, ‘sticky floors’ and ‘glass ceilings’ in Europe”, Labour Economics, 21, 86–102. co.2013.01.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labe
Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001), “The glass ceiling effect”, Social Forces, 80(2), 655–681. https://doi. org/10.1353/sof.2001.0091
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007), “Women and the labyrinth of leadership”, Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 62-71.
Filep R., & Ujhelyi M. (2021), „Maradj otthon – Áttérés home office-ra az Észak-Alföld régió ban”, Régiókutatás Szemle, 6(1), 37-47. https:// doi.org/10.30716/RSZ/21/1/3
Fodor, É., & Glass, C. (2018), “Negotiating for en titlement: Accessing parental leave in Hungarian f irms”, Gender, Work & Organization, 25(6), 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12208
Gaudecker, H.-M., Holler, R., Janys, L., Siflinger, & B.,Zimpelmann, C. (2020), Labour supply in the early stages of the CoViD-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence on hours, home office, and expectations, IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 13158, Bonn
Gergely É., & Szabó Á. (2017), „Női karrier vizsgálata felsőoktatásban tanulók körében”, Régiókutatás Szemle, 6(2), 201-212.
Juhász, C. (2015), „Az elégedettség és a motiválás gyakorlati összefüggései”, Taylor, 7(3–4), 215 221.
King, K. G. (2022), “Differences between mot her and father entrepreneurs: Management of companies, careers, and personal lives”, The International Journal of Organizational Diversity, 22(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.18848/2328 6261/CGP/v22i02/67-77
KSH (2022), https://ksh.hu/s/kiadvanyok/fenntart hato-fejlodes-indikatorai- 2022/2-17-sdg-5#2 abra (Letöltve: 2022. 10. 31.)
Malespina, A., Seifollahi, F., & Singh, C. (2024), “Trends and gender disparities in grades and grade anomalies among bioscience and health-related major students before, during, and after COVID-19 remote instruction”, Education Sciences, 14(10), 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci14101101
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009), “Preferred report ing items for systematic reviews and meta-ana lyses: The PRISMA statement”, PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pmed.1000097
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M., M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, W. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021), “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guidel ine for reporting systematic reviews”, BMJ, 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pham-Nguyen, D.-T., & McDonald, M. (2024), “You should care about marriage: Vietnamese Women’s experience of ambivalent sex ism in the STEM workplace”, SSM - Mental Health, 6, 100333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ssmmh.2024.100333
Prebreza, R., Beqiraj, B., Prebreza, B., Krypa, A., Krypa, M., Prebreza, R., & Krypa, M. (2025), “Factors influencing the lower number of wo men in STEM compared to men: A case study from Kosovo”, STEM Education, 5(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025002
Róbert P., & Medgyesi M. (2008), Munkaattitűdök időbeli változása és nemzetközi összehasonlítá sa. OTKA T 46648 sz. kutatásának zárójelenté se, https://real.mtak.hu/1520/ (Letöltve: 2025. 03. 23.)
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & The PRISMA-P Group (2015). “Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation”, BMJ, 349 :g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
Szántó G. (2023), „Üvegplafon egy önbetelje sítő jóslat?! – Karrierlehetőségek vizsgálata női munkavállalók körében”, Régiókutatás Szemle, 6(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.30716/ RSZ/21/2/10
Tardos K., & Paksi V. (2020), Tudományos karrieru tak kutatói értékelése : Női és férfiperspektívák. Magyar Szociológiai Társaság. https://real.mtak. hu/116185/ (Letöltve: 2025. 03. 23.)
Wendt, J. L., & Jones, V. O. (2024), “Peer mentors’ experiences in an online STEM peer mentoring program: beacons of light”, International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 13(3), 328–345. IJMCE-03-2023-0033 https://doi.org/10.1108/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Hungarian Journal of Marketing and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
