Home office employee satisfaction during and after Covid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2023.57.03.05Keywords:
Home office, Covid, employee satisfaction, atypical form of workAbstract
THE AIM OF THE PAPER
The aim of our study is to show how employees' satisfaction with home office changed during and after Covid. The home office became popular in Hungary during the Covid period, and many people who had not worked in this form of work before could experience its advantages and disadvantages. It is also an important aspect of how people experienced this during Covid, but since many distorting factors were present during this period (illness, stress, uncertainty, coercion, children while working at home), it is also worth examining how the satisfaction changed after the pandemic. Our main research question is also related to this, i.e. how the perception of the home office changed after the end of the pandemic.
METHODOLOGY
The applied method was a standard online questionnaire. Our research consisted of two parts. During the investigation, we first interviewed 600 Hungarian residents aged 18-64 with an online questionnaire, who had at least three months of home office experience. The first phase of the survey took place at the end of the 3rd wave of the Covid epidemic, in May and June 2021. The research took place according to specific quotas. The second research phase took place after Covid, in February and March 2022. During the research, we asked 1,000 Hungarian residents using an online questionnaire. The results are representative of the entire adult Hungarian population aged 18-64, in terms of age, gender, education, place of residence, and employment sector.
MOST IMPORTANT RESULTS
The most important results and novelties include the fact that the employees' satisfaction with the home office (satisfaction index) decreased while the positive attitude increased. The research results make it clear that employees are open to the possibility of a home office, but they no longer see it as a reward but rather expect this form of working opportunity from their employer and have higher expectations regarding the conditions.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Our practical recommendation is that the managers of small and medium-sized companies take the above results into account and, if they have the opportunity, provide the home office for their employees. This makes it even easier to retain talent, acquire new employees, and increase employee satisfaction.
References
Ásványi Zs. – Venczel-Szakó T. – Szabó-Bálint B. – Kuráth, G. (2021), “XXI. századi munkavégzési formák nemzetközi környezetben”. In: Blahó A., Czakó E. and Poór J. (szerk), Nemzetközi menedzsment. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 2021, 160–73.
Bankó Z. – Berke Gy. –Kiss Gy. – Szőke G. L. (2023), Nagykommentár a munka törvénykönyvéről szóló 2012. évi I. törvényhez., Budapest: Wolters Kluwer, www.uj.jogtar.hu
Beauregard, T. A., Basile, K. A. & Canónico, E. (2019), “Telework: Outcomes and facilitators for employees.” In: R. N. Landers (szerk.): The Cambridge handbook of technology and employee behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 511–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649636.020
Becker, E. & Kaerkes, W. (2006), “Gefühlte Bindung geht über Zufriedenheit”, Qualität und Zuverlässigkeit, 3, 18–22.
Brunelle, E. & Fortin, J-A. (2021), “Distance Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: An Examination of Teleworkers’ and Office Workers’ Job Satisfaction Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory”, SAGE Open, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020985516
Caligiuri, P., De Cieri, H., Minbaeva, D., Verbeke, A. & Zimmermann, A. (2020), “International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice”, Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00335-9
Dhamija, P., Gupta, Sh. & Bag, S. (2019), “Measuring of job satisfaction: the use of quality of work life factors”, An International Journal, 26(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-06-2018-0155
Eurofound (2020), “Living and working in Europe 2019” https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2020/living-and-working-europe-2019, (letöltés ideje: 2021.07.30)
Eurostat (2021), “Employment – annual statistics.” https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Employment_-_annual_statistics#Remote_work:_disparities_by_country_and_level_of_education (letöltve. 2023.03.31.)
Ferencz Z. (2020), “Miért okoz nehézséget a korlátozó intézkedések betartása?” https://szociologia.tk.mta.hu/uploads/files/FerenczZ_kockazatok-jarvany-FF.pdf, (letöltve: 2021.09.25.)
Gajendran, R.S. & Harrison, D.A. (2007), “The good, the bad and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
GKI (2020), A foglalkoztatottak munkahelyi helyzete 2020 júniusában. https://www.gki.hu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Foglalkoztatotts%C3%A1g_20200623.pdf, (letöltve: 2021.05.30)
Golden, T. D. & Veiga, J. F. (2005), “The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings”, Journal of Management, 31, 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271768
Grozdics A. T., Girán J., Uhrin A., Balogh G., Cakó B., Cselik B. & Borsos Á. (2023), “Working from home or back to the office? – The impact of the recent turbulence on office work”, Marketing & Menedzsment, 57(1), 25–35. doi: 10.15170/MM.2023.57.01.03
Ineson, E. M., Benke, E. & László, J. (2013), “Employee loyality in Hungarian hotels”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.04.001
Izvercian, M., Potra, S. & Ivascu, L. (2016), “Job satisfaction variables: A grounded theory approach”, Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.093
Jenei Sz. – Módosné, Szalai Sz. (2022), “A digitalis átalakulás és a koronavírus járvány hatásai a munkaerőpiacon: rugalmas munkavégzési formák térnyerése Magyarországon”, Új Munkaügyi Szemle, 3(2), 2-12. ISSN 2677-1306 http://real.mtak.hu/154522/1/Jenei.pdf (letöltve: 2023.03.30.)
KSH (2020), https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/nep/hu/nep0001.html, (letöltve: 2021.10.14)
KSH (2021), KSH Heti Monitor 2021. https://www.ksh.hu/heti-monitor/, (letöltve: 2021.11.22.)
KSH (2023), A 15–74 éves foglalkoztatottak távmunkavégzésének alakulása, háromhavi mozgóátlag, https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/mun/hu/mun0117.html (letöltve: 2023.03.31.)
Kowalski, K. & Swanson, J. (2005), “Critical success factors in developing teleworking programs”, An International Journal, 12(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770510600357
Kowalski, K. B., Aruldoss, A., Gurumurthy, B. & Parayitam, S. (2022), “Work-From-Home Productivity and Job Satisfaction: A Double-Layered Moderated Mediation Model”, Sustainability, 14(18), 11179. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811179
Niebuhr, F., Borle, P., Börner-Zobel, F., & Voleter-Mahlkencht, S. (2022), “Healthy and Happy Working from Home? Effects of Working from Home on Employee Health and Job Satisfaction”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3),1122. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031122
Noé N. (2004), “A dolgozó munkával való elégedettsége”. Marketing & Menedzsment, 38(5), 13–23.
Omondi, A. A., & K’Obonyo, P. (2018), “Flexible work schedules: a critical review of literature”, The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 5(4), 2069–2086. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952651.n97
Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2015), Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS, Routledge.
Pogácsás P. – Szepesi B. (2023), “A koronavírus hatása a magyar kis és középvállalkozásokra”, Vezetéstudomány, 54(2), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2023.02.0
Saane, N. van, Sluiter, J.K., Verbeek, J.H.A.M. & Frings-Dresen, M.H.V. (2003), "Reliability and validity of instruments measuring job satisfaction—a systematic review". Occupational Medicine, 53 (3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqg038
Siklósi A. (2021), Elbúcsúzhatunk az 5 napos munkahéttől? https://index.hu/belfold/2021/01/19/munkahet_munkahely_tavoli_munkavegzes_alkalmazott/?fbclid=IwAR3RdSbB2fbc6XXEXPRU1LQFIQgu6xDSlZwVrIVH7oBwtbpLeGCzL_9Qh28 (letöltve: 2021.09.29)
Sipos N. (2016), “A munkaelégedettség Herzberg-modelljének továbbfejlesztése a frissdiplomások 2011–2014 adatbázisok alapján”, Vezetéstudomány, 47(12), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2016.12.09
Smite, D., Moe, N. B., Hildrum, J., Gonzalez-Huerta, J. & Mendez, D. (2023), “Work-from-home is here to stay: Call for flexibility in post-pandemic work policies”, Journal of Systems and Software, 195. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111552
Szabó-Bálint B. (2018), “A munkavállalói siker és az elérését támogató szervezeti karriermenedzsment-eszközök.”, Vezetéstudomány, 49(10-11), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2018.10.08
Szabó D. A. (2021), “Regionális bérjövedelem-különbségek a gazdaságtudományi területen végzett frissdiplomások esetében”, Tér és Társadalom, 35(3), 182-208. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.35.3.3352
Szabó M.A. (2022), Hatályba lépett (?) a home office törvénycsomag. Adó Online, https://ado.hu/munkaugyek/hatalyba-lepett-a-home-office-torvenycsomag/#:~:text=Rugalmas%20home%20office%20szabályok,munkavégzés%20rendszeresen%20távmunka%20keretében%20folytatható (letöltve: 2023.09.29)
Venczel-Szakó T. (2021), Atipikusból a tipikus felé? A COVID-19 járvány hatása a home office és a munkavállalói elégedettség relációjára. Doktori értekezés, Pécs: PTE-KTK.
Venczel-Szakó T., – Balogh G., – Borgulya, Á. (2021), “Távmunka, home office: Hogyan érinti a távolról dolgozás a szervezet intern kommunikációját?” Vezetéstudomány, 52(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2021.02.07
Venczel-Szakó T. (2022), "Munkavállalói elégedettség a home office-ban A COVID-19 járvány hatása az otthoni munkavégzésre”. Doktori Disszertáció. Pécs: Pécsi Tudományegyetem Közgazdaságtudományi Kar. 203.
Yang, J.-T. (2010), “Antecedents and consequences of job satisfaction in the hotel industry”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.11.002
