The bright and the dark side of humorous ads: Literature review on the potential effects of humorous advertisements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2023.57.02.04Keywords:
humorous advertisements, the impact of humour, negative humour, Benign Violation TheoryAbstract
THE AIM OF THE PAPER
The study aims to review the literature on humorous advertising, the apropos humour theory that has rarely been discussed in Hungarian literature, and the Benign Violation Theory (McGraw & Warren 2010). We seek to integrate classical humour and humorous advertising models with the new theory. Our aim is to integrate classical humour theories, theories on humorous ads and the new model.
METHODOLOGY
The study is a review of the literature on general humour theories and humorous advertising. The novelty of the review lies in the fact that it extends the potential negative effects of humour. Classical theories and more recent publications are included in the summarized material.
MOST IMPORTANT RESULTS
In general theories and typologies of humour, offensive forms of humour have appeared from the very beginning, and the negative effects of applying humour have been recognised. Although the studies on the impacts of humorous advertising often indicated negative effects, models on humorous advertising described almost exclusively positive effects. Recent research on humour showed that considering negative effects while studying humour is paramount. This is particularly true in cases of offensive humour. An integrated study of the positive and negative aspects could be the next logical step forward in the scientific study of humorous advertisements.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In addition to the much-studied positive effects of humour, negative aspects should also be emphasised in humorous advertisement studies. An integrated approach to the study of the impacts of humorous advertisements would be a step forward, as beyond being attention-grabbing, humorous ads can be offending or outrageous. The effect depends on the ad type, the brand and the cultural norms. When designing research of impact, one should consider humour types evoking both positive and negative feelings to model and predict the effect of an advertisement in a more complex way. This could lead to a more accurate prediction in designing an advertisement or a whole marketing campaign.
References
Alden, D. L., Hoyer, W. D. & Lee, C. (1993), “Identifying Global and Culture-Specific Dimensions of Humor in Advertising: A Multinational Analysis”, Journal of Marketing, 57(2), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700205
Alden, D. L., Mukherjee, A. & Hoyer, W. D. (2000), “The Effects of Incongruity, Surprise and Positive Moderators on Perceived Humor in Television Advertising”, Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00913367.2000.10673605
Armstrong, J. S. (2010), Persuasive Advertising: Evidence-Based Principles, New York: Pelgrave Macmillan.
Berger, A. A. (1993), An Anatomy of Humor, NJ: New Brunswick: Transaction Publisher
Blackford, B. J., Gentry, J., Harrison, R. L. & Carlson, L. (2011), “The Prevalence and Influence of the Combination of Humor and Violence in Super Bowl Commercials,” Journal of Advertising, 40(Winter), 123–34.
Buijzen, M. & Valkenburg, P. M. (2004), “Developing a Typology of Humor in Audiovisual Media”, Media Psychology, 6(2), 147-167. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0602_2
Catanescu, C. & Tom G. (2001), “Types of Humor in Television and Magazine Advertising” Review of Business, 22, 92-5. http://www.managementparadise.com/uploads_blog/280000/279436/0_1005.docx (Utolsó letöltés: 2023. 02. 16.)
Doubravszky, J. (1997), „A humor szerepe a reklámban”, Marketing & Menedzsment, 31(5), 40-51. Elérhető: https://journals.lib.pte.hu/index.php/mm/article/view/2069 (Utolsó letöltés: 2023. január 5.)
Douglas, S. P. & Craig, S. (2007), “Advertising Across Cultures”, in: G. J. Tessis, T. Ambler (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Advertising, Los Angeles: SAGE, 416-429.
Eisend, M. (2009), “A Meta-analysis of Humor in Advertising”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0096-y
Eisend, M. (2011), “How Humor in Advertising Works: A Meta-analytic Test of Alternative Models”, Marketing Letters, 22(2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-010-9116-z
Freud, S. (1905), Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious, New York: Norton First
Freud, S. (1928), “Humor. International”, Journal of Psychoanalysis, 9, 1-6.
Goldenberg, J. & Mazursky, D. (2008), “When deep structures Surface: Design Structures That Can Repeatedly Surprise”, Journal of Advertising, 34, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370402
Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D. & Solomon, S. (1999), “The Fundamental Templates of Quality Ads”, Marketing Science, 18(3), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.18.3.333
Goldenberg, J., Levav, A., Mazursky, D. & Solomon, S. (2009), Cracking the Ad Code, Cambridge: University Press.
Goldstein, J. & McGhee, P. (eds.) (1972), The Psychology of Humor, New York: Academic Press
Gruner, C. R. (1978), Understanding Laughter: The Workings of Wit and Humor, Chicago: Nelson Hall
Gulas, C. S., McKeage K. & Weinberger M.G. (2010), “It’s Just a Joke: Violence Against Males in Humorous Advertising”, Journal of Advertising, 39(4), 109-20. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315706726-11
Gulas, C. S. & Weinberger, M. G. (2006), Humor in Advertising. A Comprehensive Analysis, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Haidt, J. & Hersh, M. A. (2001), “Sexual Morality: The Cultures and Emotions of Conservatives and Liberals”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 191-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02489.x
Haidt, J., Koller, S.H. & Dias, M.G. (1993), “Affect, Culture, and Morality, or is it Wrong to Eat Your Dog”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613-628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613
Hye-Knudsen, M. (2018), „Painfully Funny: Cringe Comedy, Benign Masochism, and Not-so-Benign Violations”, Leviathan: Interdisciplinary Journal in English, 2, 13-31. https://tidsskrift.dk/lev/article/download/104693/153596/0 (Utolsó letöltés: 2023. 02. 16.)
Kaszás Gy. (2014), Reklámcsinálás: A kis adrenalinjáték. Budapest: HVG Kiadó.
McCullough, L. S. & Taylor, R. K. (1993), “Humor in American, British and German Ads”, Industrial Marketing Management, 22. 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(93)90016-z
McGraw, A. P. & Warren, C. (2010), “Benign Violations: Making Immoral Behavior Funny”, Psychological Science, 21(8), 1141-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376073
Meyer, J. C. (2000), “Humor as a Double-edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication”, Communication Theory, 10(3), 310-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00194.x
Michelberger M. (2000), A lyukacsos tehén. Budapest: Aula Kiadó.
Muller, S., Hoffmann, S., Schwartz, U. & Gelbrich, K. (2011), “The Effectiveness of Humor in Advertising: A Cross-cultural Study in Germany and Russia”, Journal of Euromarketing, 20(1-2), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.9768/0020.01-2.007
Núñez-Barriopedro, E., Goralczyk Klusek, K. & Tobar-Pesántez, L. (2019), „The Effectiveness of Humor in Advertising: Analysis from an International Scope”, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 1-11.
Ogilvy, D. (2004), Ogilvy on Advertising, Singaure: Prion.
Oring, E. (1982), „Book Reviews”, Western States Folklore Society, 41(1), 62-66. https://doi.org/10.2307/1499728
Pornpitakpan, C. & Tan, T. K. (2000), „The Influence of Incongruity on the Effectiveness of Humorous Advertisements”, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 12(3), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1300/j046v12n03_03
Radford, T. (2001), „Scientists Close in on World’s Funniest Joke”, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/dec/20/humanities.research (Utolsó letöltés: 2023. 07. 15.)
Raskin, V. (1985), Semantic Mechanisms of Humor, Boston: D. Reidel
Sas, I. (2007), Az ötletes reklám. Budapest: Kommunikációs Akadémia.
Sas I. (2012), Reklám és pszichológia a webkorszakban. Upgrade 3.0. Budapest: Kommunikációs Akadémia.
Schnell, Zs. (2022), „A humor szerepe a pszichológiában és a társalgásban”, in Cs. Pléh (szerk.), Pszichológia, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 816-865.
Schrim, A. (2010), „A humor a manipuláció szolgálatában–reklámplakátok elemzése”. in: Litovkina A. T., Barta P, Hidasi J. (szerk.): A humor dimenziói, Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó, 146-154.
Speck, P. S. (1987), On Humor and Humor in Advertising, [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Texas tech University, https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/2346/12276/31295000271832.pdf?sequence=1 (Utolsó letöltés: 2023. 02. 16.)
Suls, J. (1983), “Cognitive Processes in Humor Appreciation”, In Goldstein J. (ed.): Handbook of Humor Research, New York: Springer-Verlag, 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_3
Veatch, T.C. (1998), “A Theory of Humor”, Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 11(2), 161-215. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1998.11.2.161
Warren, C., Carter, E. P. & McGraw A. P. (2019), “Being Funny is not Enough: the Influence of Perceived Humor and Negative Emotional Reactions on Brand Attitudes”, International Journal of Advertising, 38(7), 1025-1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1620090
Warren, C. & McGraw, A. P. (2013), “When Humor Backfires: Revisiting the Relationship Between Humorous Marketing and Brand Attitude”, Marketing Science Institute Reports, 1(1), 13-124. http://thearf-org-unified-admin.s3.amazonaws.com/MSI/2020/06/MSI_Report_13-124.pdf (Utolsó letöltés: 2023. 02. 16.)
Warren, C. & McGraw, A. P. (2016), “When Does Humorous Marketing Hurt Brands?”, Journal of Marketing Behavior, 2(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1561/107.00000027
Weinberger, M. G. & Gulas, C. S. (1992), “The Impact of Humor in Advertising: A Review”, Journal of Advertising, 21(4), 35-59. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.1992.10673384
Weinberger, M. G. & Gulas, C. S. (2019), “The Emergence of a Half-century of Research on Humour in Advertising: What Have We Learned? What Do We Still Need to Learn?”, International Journal of Advertising, 38(7), 911–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1598831
Weinberger, M. G., Gulas, C. S. & Weinberger, M. F. (2015), “Looking in Through Outdoor: A Socio-cultural and Historical Perspective on the Evolution of Advertising Humour”, International Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 447-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1006082
Zhang, Y. & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006), „Responses to Humorous Ads. Does Audience Involvement Matter?”, Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.2753/joa0091-3367350408
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Hungarian Journal of Marketing and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
