Keep Energy Prices Down, Industry in, Competition High, Manipulation Out Europe

Comparing the Practices of the United States of America with the European Commission’s “Clean Energy Package”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47272/KIKPhD.2025.3.4

Keywords:

REMIT, Insider trading, Market manipulation, Wholesale energy products

Abstract

Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market in electricity, which amends Directive 2012/27/EU, advocates for the phasing out of regulated household electricity prices in favour of a fully liberalised retail electricity market. According to the author’s position, the removal of regulated end-user prices adversely affects Hungarian household consumers. This stance is supported by the economic argument that genuine competition in the household electricity market can only function effectively – thus should only be permitted by law – under specific conditions: the presence of a developed economy with abundant domestically sourced energy resources; high individual income levels, which enhance consumer engagement; widespread adoption of energy-efficient, cost-effective technologies and innovations at the household level. Only where these criteria are met can liberalisation result in reduced household energy costs and increased energy savings over the long term. In all other contexts, even partial liberalisation of the retail market tends to trigger a spiralling increase in household energy prices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Attila Nyikos, Office for Supported Research Groups, HUN-REN TKI

Director, Office for Supported Research Groups, HUN-REN TKI (Hungary)

Doctorate student, University of Pécs, Doctoral School of Law (Hungary)

Corresponding address: nyikosdr@gmail.com

 

Statements

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Funding

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, or publication of this article.

Data deposition and availability

There is no data set associated with the study. No data deposition was required for this study.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

The author did not use any artificial intelligence system in the preparation of this article.

Author contributions (CRediT)

Conceptualization; Methodology; Investigation; Formal analysis; Resources; Data curation; Writing – Original Draft; Writing – Review & Editing.

References

Berceanu, Ionuț Bogdan, Mihaela Victorița Cărăușan and Alina Zorzoană. ’The Regulation of Market Manipulation in the EU Energy Sector: Doctrinal Analysis of REMIT II’s Sanctioning Framework.’ (2025) 14(5) Laws 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14050061

Godin, Jean-Theodore, Manon Polet and Arthur Jamar De Bolsée, ’Implementing REMIT: What a Legal Analysis Tells about the (Regulatory) Role of ACER.’ (2018) 9(2) European Journal of Risk Regulation 192-207. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2018.17

Balázs Hohmann, ‘The Interpretation of Transparency from the Legal Point of View’ in Tamás Haffner (ed), 4th Youth in Europe Conference – Proceedings (Sopianae Cultural Association 2018)

Balázs Hohmann, 'The Principles and Fundamental Requirements of the Transparency on the Public Administrative Proceedings' in Suresh P (ed), Proceedings of the IIER International Conference, Dubai, UAE (International Institute of Engineers and Researchers 2019)

Balázs Hohmann, 'Integrity Advisors and the Development of Administrative Communication Culture' (2019) 4(1) European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms-2019.v4i1-527

Balázs Hohmann, ‘Az alternatív vitarendezés lehetőségei a közigazgatási hatósági eljárás keretében’ [The Possibilities of Alternative Dispute Resolution within Administrative Authority Proceedings] (2019) 19(1) Európai Jog: Az Európai Jogakadémia Folyóirata 23.

Lakić, E., Jeriha, J., Medved, T., Vućić, D., Topić, D. and Knežević, G., ’Unveiling market manipulation in EU energy markets-Insights from ACER enforcement cases’ in 2025 21st International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM) (IEEE 2025) 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM64765.2025.11050114

Ratliff, John and Mariia Shulha, ’Amendments to REMIT in 2024.’ EU Energy Law Volume X: Energy Market Manipulation and Insider Trading Law in Europe–REMIT (Edward Elgar Publishing 2025) 877-904. https://doi.org/10.4337/9789077644225.00035

Ratliff, J., and Nteve, M., ’Market Manipulation Under Remit-Key Concepts And Developing Enforcement Practice’ (2020) European Energy & Climate Journal (Claeys & Casteels BV) 9. https://doi.org/10.4337/eecj.2020.02-03.07

Ratliff, John, ’REMIT in the United Kingdom’ EU Energy Law Volume X: Energy Market Manipulation and Insider Trading Law in Europe–REMIT. (Edward Elgar Publishing 2025) 695-729. https://doi.org/10.4337/9789077644225.00031

Rushkovskyi, M. and Rasshyvalov, D., ’European Remit Regulation As The Latest Determinant Of Corporate Risk Management Strategies In Energy Sector’ (2022) 3 (1) Green, Blue and Digital Economy Journal 40-46. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5169/2022-1-7

Zani, A., Spisto, A., Vitiello, S., Grisi, P., Siface, D., Gelmini, A. and Geracitano, A., ’Case studies analysis of REMIT regulation’ in 2020 17th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM) (IEEE 2020) 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM49802.2020.9221989

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Nyikos, Attila. “Keep Energy Prices Down, Industry In, Competition High, Manipulation Out Europe: Comparing the Practices of the United States of America With the European Commission’s ‘Clean Energy Package’”. Közigazgatási és Infokommunikációs Jogi PhD Tanulmányok (PhD Studies in Administrative and ICT Law), vol. 6, no. 3, Dec. 2025, pp. 53-73, doi:10.47272/KIKPhD.2025.3.4.

Issue

Section

Articles