For reviewers
Thank you for volunteering to maintain the high quality of the publications in Social Review. Reviewers have a key role in the publication process. We say thanks for your work by providing a list of our external reviewers at https://journals.lib.pte.hu/index.php/szocialisszemle/about/Reviewers
Procedure
The journal operates a two-level review process. A competent member of the editorial board performs the first review. They may decide to continue with a peer review process, request a thorough revision and resubmission by the author(s) or reject the manuscript. Double-blind peer review is performed by independent experts, academics, or renowned practitioners. For interviews, practice reflections, and literature reviews, first-level (editorial) review is often considered sufficient, but editors may choose to ask one independent reviewer for their opinion. For empirical studies and theoretical papers, two external reviewers are asked to assess scientific quality. If the competent editor’s and the external reviewer’s opinions are different then the editor-in-chief will ask for a second independent opinion.
Before starting your work, please read our mission statement, available at https://journals.lib.pte.hu/index.php/szocialisszemle/Mission. Follow COPE principles and report any potential conflicting interests: https://publicationethics.org/sites/default/files/ethical-guidelines-peer-reviewers-cope.pdf
Please use and fill in the downloadable form. You can send the completed review to the responsible editor (erdos.marta@pte.hu) or use the electronic submission system of the journal.
